| /haiku/src/system/kernel/ |
| H A D | timer.cpp | 0338371f26864c2a248b1ea53b9fe78c884af7f2 Sun Dec 13 21:18:27 UTC 2009 Ingo Weinhold <ingo_weinhold@gmx.de> * All scheduler implementations:
- enqueue_in_run_queue() no longer returns whether rescheduling is supposed
to happen. Instead is sets cpu_ent::invoke_scheduler on the current CPU.
- reschedule() does now handle cpu_ent::invoke_scheduler_if_idle(). No need
to let all callers do that.
* thread_unblock[_locked]() no longer return whether rescheduling is supposed
to happen.
* Got rid of the B_INVOKE_SCHEDULER handling. The interrupt hooks really
can't know, when it makes sense to reschedule or not.
* Introduced scheduler_reschedule_if_necessary[_locked]() functions for
checking+invoking the scheduler.
* Some semaphore functions (e.g. delete_sem()) invoke the scheduler now, if
they wake up anything with greater priority.
I've also tried to add scheduler invocations in the condition variable and
mutex/rw_lock code, but that actually has a negative impact on performance,
probably because it causes too much ping-ponging between threads when
multiple locking primitives are involved.
git-svn-id: file:///srv/svn/repos/haiku/haiku/trunk@34657 a95241bf-73f2-0310-859d-f6bbb57e9c96
|
| H A D | int.cpp | 0338371f26864c2a248b1ea53b9fe78c884af7f2 Sun Dec 13 21:18:27 UTC 2009 Ingo Weinhold <ingo_weinhold@gmx.de> * All scheduler implementations:
- enqueue_in_run_queue() no longer returns whether rescheduling is supposed
to happen. Instead is sets cpu_ent::invoke_scheduler on the current CPU.
- reschedule() does now handle cpu_ent::invoke_scheduler_if_idle(). No need
to let all callers do that.
* thread_unblock[_locked]() no longer return whether rescheduling is supposed
to happen.
* Got rid of the B_INVOKE_SCHEDULER handling. The interrupt hooks really
can't know, when it makes sense to reschedule or not.
* Introduced scheduler_reschedule_if_necessary[_locked]() functions for
checking+invoking the scheduler.
* Some semaphore functions (e.g. delete_sem()) invoke the scheduler now, if
they wake up anything with greater priority.
I've also tried to add scheduler invocations in the condition variable and
mutex/rw_lock code, but that actually has a negative impact on performance,
probably because it causes too much ping-ponging between threads when
multiple locking primitives are involved.
git-svn-id: file:///srv/svn/repos/haiku/haiku/trunk@34657 a95241bf-73f2-0310-859d-f6bbb57e9c96
|
| H A D | sem.cpp | 0338371f26864c2a248b1ea53b9fe78c884af7f2 Sun Dec 13 21:18:27 UTC 2009 Ingo Weinhold <ingo_weinhold@gmx.de> * All scheduler implementations:
- enqueue_in_run_queue() no longer returns whether rescheduling is supposed
to happen. Instead is sets cpu_ent::invoke_scheduler on the current CPU.
- reschedule() does now handle cpu_ent::invoke_scheduler_if_idle(). No need
to let all callers do that.
* thread_unblock[_locked]() no longer return whether rescheduling is supposed
to happen.
* Got rid of the B_INVOKE_SCHEDULER handling. The interrupt hooks really
can't know, when it makes sense to reschedule or not.
* Introduced scheduler_reschedule_if_necessary[_locked]() functions for
checking+invoking the scheduler.
* Some semaphore functions (e.g. delete_sem()) invoke the scheduler now, if
they wake up anything with greater priority.
I've also tried to add scheduler invocations in the condition variable and
mutex/rw_lock code, but that actually has a negative impact on performance,
probably because it causes too much ping-ponging between threads when
multiple locking primitives are involved.
git-svn-id: file:///srv/svn/repos/haiku/haiku/trunk@34657 a95241bf-73f2-0310-859d-f6bbb57e9c96
|
| H A D | signal.cpp | 0338371f26864c2a248b1ea53b9fe78c884af7f2 Sun Dec 13 21:18:27 UTC 2009 Ingo Weinhold <ingo_weinhold@gmx.de> * All scheduler implementations:
- enqueue_in_run_queue() no longer returns whether rescheduling is supposed
to happen. Instead is sets cpu_ent::invoke_scheduler on the current CPU.
- reschedule() does now handle cpu_ent::invoke_scheduler_if_idle(). No need
to let all callers do that.
* thread_unblock[_locked]() no longer return whether rescheduling is supposed
to happen.
* Got rid of the B_INVOKE_SCHEDULER handling. The interrupt hooks really
can't know, when it makes sense to reschedule or not.
* Introduced scheduler_reschedule_if_necessary[_locked]() functions for
checking+invoking the scheduler.
* Some semaphore functions (e.g. delete_sem()) invoke the scheduler now, if
they wake up anything with greater priority.
I've also tried to add scheduler invocations in the condition variable and
mutex/rw_lock code, but that actually has a negative impact on performance,
probably because it causes too much ping-ponging between threads when
multiple locking primitives are involved.
git-svn-id: file:///srv/svn/repos/haiku/haiku/trunk@34657 a95241bf-73f2-0310-859d-f6bbb57e9c96
|
| H A D | thread.cpp | 0338371f26864c2a248b1ea53b9fe78c884af7f2 Sun Dec 13 21:18:27 UTC 2009 Ingo Weinhold <ingo_weinhold@gmx.de> * All scheduler implementations:
- enqueue_in_run_queue() no longer returns whether rescheduling is supposed
to happen. Instead is sets cpu_ent::invoke_scheduler on the current CPU.
- reschedule() does now handle cpu_ent::invoke_scheduler_if_idle(). No need
to let all callers do that.
* thread_unblock[_locked]() no longer return whether rescheduling is supposed
to happen.
* Got rid of the B_INVOKE_SCHEDULER handling. The interrupt hooks really
can't know, when it makes sense to reschedule or not.
* Introduced scheduler_reschedule_if_necessary[_locked]() functions for
checking+invoking the scheduler.
* Some semaphore functions (e.g. delete_sem()) invoke the scheduler now, if
they wake up anything with greater priority.
I've also tried to add scheduler invocations in the condition variable and
mutex/rw_lock code, but that actually has a negative impact on performance,
probably because it causes too much ping-ponging between threads when
multiple locking primitives are involved.
git-svn-id: file:///srv/svn/repos/haiku/haiku/trunk@34657 a95241bf-73f2-0310-859d-f6bbb57e9c96
|
| /haiku/headers/private/kernel/ |
| H A D | kscheduler.h | 0338371f26864c2a248b1ea53b9fe78c884af7f2 Sun Dec 13 21:18:27 UTC 2009 Ingo Weinhold <ingo_weinhold@gmx.de> * All scheduler implementations:
- enqueue_in_run_queue() no longer returns whether rescheduling is supposed
to happen. Instead is sets cpu_ent::invoke_scheduler on the current CPU.
- reschedule() does now handle cpu_ent::invoke_scheduler_if_idle(). No need
to let all callers do that.
* thread_unblock[_locked]() no longer return whether rescheduling is supposed
to happen.
* Got rid of the B_INVOKE_SCHEDULER handling. The interrupt hooks really
can't know, when it makes sense to reschedule or not.
* Introduced scheduler_reschedule_if_necessary[_locked]() functions for
checking+invoking the scheduler.
* Some semaphore functions (e.g. delete_sem()) invoke the scheduler now, if
they wake up anything with greater priority.
I've also tried to add scheduler invocations in the condition variable and
mutex/rw_lock code, but that actually has a negative impact on performance,
probably because it causes too much ping-ponging between threads when
multiple locking primitives are involved.
git-svn-id: file:///srv/svn/repos/haiku/haiku/trunk@34657 a95241bf-73f2-0310-859d-f6bbb57e9c96
|
| H A D | thread.h | 0338371f26864c2a248b1ea53b9fe78c884af7f2 Sun Dec 13 21:18:27 UTC 2009 Ingo Weinhold <ingo_weinhold@gmx.de> * All scheduler implementations:
- enqueue_in_run_queue() no longer returns whether rescheduling is supposed
to happen. Instead is sets cpu_ent::invoke_scheduler on the current CPU.
- reschedule() does now handle cpu_ent::invoke_scheduler_if_idle(). No need
to let all callers do that.
* thread_unblock[_locked]() no longer return whether rescheduling is supposed
to happen.
* Got rid of the B_INVOKE_SCHEDULER handling. The interrupt hooks really
can't know, when it makes sense to reschedule or not.
* Introduced scheduler_reschedule_if_necessary[_locked]() functions for
checking+invoking the scheduler.
* Some semaphore functions (e.g. delete_sem()) invoke the scheduler now, if
they wake up anything with greater priority.
I've also tried to add scheduler invocations in the condition variable and
mutex/rw_lock code, but that actually has a negative impact on performance,
probably because it causes too much ping-ponging between threads when
multiple locking primitives are involved.
git-svn-id: file:///srv/svn/repos/haiku/haiku/trunk@34657 a95241bf-73f2-0310-859d-f6bbb57e9c96
|
| /haiku/src/system/kernel/arch/m68k/ |
| H A D | arch_int.cpp | 0338371f26864c2a248b1ea53b9fe78c884af7f2 Sun Dec 13 21:18:27 UTC 2009 Ingo Weinhold <ingo_weinhold@gmx.de> * All scheduler implementations:
- enqueue_in_run_queue() no longer returns whether rescheduling is supposed
to happen. Instead is sets cpu_ent::invoke_scheduler on the current CPU.
- reschedule() does now handle cpu_ent::invoke_scheduler_if_idle(). No need
to let all callers do that.
* thread_unblock[_locked]() no longer return whether rescheduling is supposed
to happen.
* Got rid of the B_INVOKE_SCHEDULER handling. The interrupt hooks really
can't know, when it makes sense to reschedule or not.
* Introduced scheduler_reschedule_if_necessary[_locked]() functions for
checking+invoking the scheduler.
* Some semaphore functions (e.g. delete_sem()) invoke the scheduler now, if
they wake up anything with greater priority.
I've also tried to add scheduler invocations in the condition variable and
mutex/rw_lock code, but that actually has a negative impact on performance,
probably because it causes too much ping-ponging between threads when
multiple locking primitives are involved.
git-svn-id: file:///srv/svn/repos/haiku/haiku/trunk@34657 a95241bf-73f2-0310-859d-f6bbb57e9c96
|
| /haiku/src/system/kernel/arch/ppc/ |
| H A D | arch_int.cpp | 0338371f26864c2a248b1ea53b9fe78c884af7f2 Sun Dec 13 21:18:27 UTC 2009 Ingo Weinhold <ingo_weinhold@gmx.de> * All scheduler implementations:
- enqueue_in_run_queue() no longer returns whether rescheduling is supposed
to happen. Instead is sets cpu_ent::invoke_scheduler on the current CPU.
- reschedule() does now handle cpu_ent::invoke_scheduler_if_idle(). No need
to let all callers do that.
* thread_unblock[_locked]() no longer return whether rescheduling is supposed
to happen.
* Got rid of the B_INVOKE_SCHEDULER handling. The interrupt hooks really
can't know, when it makes sense to reschedule or not.
* Introduced scheduler_reschedule_if_necessary[_locked]() functions for
checking+invoking the scheduler.
* Some semaphore functions (e.g. delete_sem()) invoke the scheduler now, if
they wake up anything with greater priority.
I've also tried to add scheduler invocations in the condition variable and
mutex/rw_lock code, but that actually has a negative impact on performance,
probably because it causes too much ping-ponging between threads when
multiple locking primitives are involved.
git-svn-id: file:///srv/svn/repos/haiku/haiku/trunk@34657 a95241bf-73f2-0310-859d-f6bbb57e9c96
|
| /haiku/src/system/kernel/fs/ |
| H A D | fifo.cpp | 0338371f26864c2a248b1ea53b9fe78c884af7f2 Sun Dec 13 21:18:27 UTC 2009 Ingo Weinhold <ingo_weinhold@gmx.de> * All scheduler implementations:
- enqueue_in_run_queue() no longer returns whether rescheduling is supposed
to happen. Instead is sets cpu_ent::invoke_scheduler on the current CPU.
- reschedule() does now handle cpu_ent::invoke_scheduler_if_idle(). No need
to let all callers do that.
* thread_unblock[_locked]() no longer return whether rescheduling is supposed
to happen.
* Got rid of the B_INVOKE_SCHEDULER handling. The interrupt hooks really
can't know, when it makes sense to reschedule or not.
* Introduced scheduler_reschedule_if_necessary[_locked]() functions for
checking+invoking the scheduler.
* Some semaphore functions (e.g. delete_sem()) invoke the scheduler now, if
they wake up anything with greater priority.
I've also tried to add scheduler invocations in the condition variable and
mutex/rw_lock code, but that actually has a negative impact on performance,
probably because it causes too much ping-ponging between threads when
multiple locking primitives are involved.
git-svn-id: file:///srv/svn/repos/haiku/haiku/trunk@34657 a95241bf-73f2-0310-859d-f6bbb57e9c96
|
| /haiku/src/system/kernel/arch/x86/ |
| H A D | arch_int.cpp | 0338371f26864c2a248b1ea53b9fe78c884af7f2 Sun Dec 13 21:18:27 UTC 2009 Ingo Weinhold <ingo_weinhold@gmx.de> * All scheduler implementations:
- enqueue_in_run_queue() no longer returns whether rescheduling is supposed
to happen. Instead is sets cpu_ent::invoke_scheduler on the current CPU.
- reschedule() does now handle cpu_ent::invoke_scheduler_if_idle(). No need
to let all callers do that.
* thread_unblock[_locked]() no longer return whether rescheduling is supposed
to happen.
* Got rid of the B_INVOKE_SCHEDULER handling. The interrupt hooks really
can't know, when it makes sense to reschedule or not.
* Introduced scheduler_reschedule_if_necessary[_locked]() functions for
checking+invoking the scheduler.
* Some semaphore functions (e.g. delete_sem()) invoke the scheduler now, if
they wake up anything with greater priority.
I've also tried to add scheduler invocations in the condition variable and
mutex/rw_lock code, but that actually has a negative impact on performance,
probably because it causes too much ping-ponging between threads when
multiple locking primitives are involved.
git-svn-id: file:///srv/svn/repos/haiku/haiku/trunk@34657 a95241bf-73f2-0310-859d-f6bbb57e9c96
|
| /haiku/src/system/kernel/debug/ |
| H A D | user_debugger.cpp | 0338371f26864c2a248b1ea53b9fe78c884af7f2 Sun Dec 13 21:18:27 UTC 2009 Ingo Weinhold <ingo_weinhold@gmx.de> * All scheduler implementations:
- enqueue_in_run_queue() no longer returns whether rescheduling is supposed
to happen. Instead is sets cpu_ent::invoke_scheduler on the current CPU.
- reschedule() does now handle cpu_ent::invoke_scheduler_if_idle(). No need
to let all callers do that.
* thread_unblock[_locked]() no longer return whether rescheduling is supposed
to happen.
* Got rid of the B_INVOKE_SCHEDULER handling. The interrupt hooks really
can't know, when it makes sense to reschedule or not.
* Introduced scheduler_reschedule_if_necessary[_locked]() functions for
checking+invoking the scheduler.
* Some semaphore functions (e.g. delete_sem()) invoke the scheduler now, if
they wake up anything with greater priority.
I've also tried to add scheduler invocations in the condition variable and
mutex/rw_lock code, but that actually has a negative impact on performance,
probably because it causes too much ping-ponging between threads when
multiple locking primitives are involved.
git-svn-id: file:///srv/svn/repos/haiku/haiku/trunk@34657 a95241bf-73f2-0310-859d-f6bbb57e9c96
|